My "complete world traveler" language list

I’ve often dreamed about being able to go anywhere and talk to anyone, hoping that one day I would eventually become something between polyglot and omniglot, traveling freely throughout the world on my own terms. Not long ago, I came across this post at I Kinda Like Languages, and it got me thinking about what my list would look like.

Rather than basing my studies on complete speculation, I prefer to have some data to support my expectations. I recently found this cool interactive map of the world’s languages, but after playing with it for a few moments I found it disheartening. It only lists official language per country, and if you used it as your only source, you’d be justified in assuming you need to learn several dozen languages! That might take your whole life, and it wouldn’t really have a huge payoff.

Fortunately, we can trust the good people of the world to keep Wikipedia up to date with lots of relevant and useful information. So I started with a few assumptions and set about collecting data. I’ve found that most of my assumptions were right, and that a few were not. Most surprisingly, I found that one could reasonably travel throughout most of the civilized world with knowledge of just eight languages.

English

English langauge coverage
As an official language, English almost completely covers two continents, but that’s just the start. I’m sure this needs no explanation, but just to state the obvious, English is the most relevant international language. This is no doubt a product of two things: the British Empire, and 20th century American capitalism. Whatever the cause, though, the net result is the same: the most studied second-language everywhere in the world is English. If you travel and you can’t find someone who speaks even just a little bit of Engligh, you’re just not trying.

Spanish

Spanish language coverage
Spanish covers approximately half of two continents — including almost every part of The Americas that is not English-speaking. The exception here is Portuguese in Brazil, but it’s very similar to Spanish, so learning it isn’t so complicated.

Russian

Russian language coverage
The Soviet Union hasn’t been gone that long, so Russian is not only necessary in Russia, the largest country in the world, but it’s still significantly used throughout the entire former-Soviet Bloc. Knowledge of Russian opens up most of Eastern Europe and the entire northern half of Asia.

Arabic

Arabic language coverage
Arabic covers almost all of the Middle East, and most of northern Africa, to say nothing of all the Arabic people who have migrated into Europe and elsewhere. It should be understood that there are several different dialects of Arabic, but while that might be important for a dignitary, I don’t believe that would pose a significant challenge to the purposes of a world-traveling polyglot.

French

French language coverage
French rounds out the trio of North American languages, is significantly understood in Europe, and widely used throughout western Africa. Also, prior to the rise of English, French was the de facto world traveler’s language, and behind English it is still widely studied as a second-language around the world.

Turkish

Turkish language coverage
Turkish is most important in Turkey, but has a surprisingly widespread influence. In addition to an understandably large representation southeast Europe, it also has a huge presence in Germany. There is a smaller, but notable presence of Turkish in North America, Australia, and Russia, and several Central Asian countries which speak Turkic languages.

Chinese

Chinese language coverage
Discussion of Chinese as a language is misleading, as there are several languages spoken in China, and given the number of Chinese people, even a small percentage is significant on a world scale. Mandarin (whose name in Chinese is “the common language”) is the official language in China, enjoys the most prolific use, and would be the obvious first choice. The presence of Chinese language around the world is quite wide spread, but in all cases rather low outside of China, and it is for that reason that Chinese ranks rather low on this list.

Portuguese

Portuguese language coverage
And finally, like China, Portuguese opens up access to large, heavily populated parts of the world, and should be included, but Portuguese has even more limited representation outside of it’s native use, and for that reason falls at the very bottom of the list.

In summary

North America is almost completely covered by just three languages: English, Spanish, and French. (And the necessity for French is debatable.) A fluent speaker of those three languages can comfortably communicate with anyone he or she encounters in North America. Chinese and Turkish, while definitely not neccessary, have the potential to come in handy.

South America is mostly covered by just two languages — Spanish and Portuguese — and if you add English and French to the mix, you’re completely covered for almost any situation. Chinese might have a very limited use as well.

Australia is dominated by English, and there is no reason to think you’d need anything else, though Chinese and Turkish appear to offer some potential.

Asia if you speak Russian and Mandarin, you’ve probably got most of Asia covered. English is sure to be handy tourist centers. And thanks to the Ottoman Empire, the influences of Turkish can be handy in parts of central Asia beyond just Turkey. We start to see a lot more diversity in Asia, but it is reasonable to assume that an understanding of English, Russian, and Mandarin should be enough to get by in countries like Japan, Thailand, Singapore, or India, where their language is different, but not widespread enough to make this list.

In the Middle East, knowledge of Arabic and Turkish seems to cover quite a bit. Mostly Arabic. It would be good to know the regional differences for Arabic, of which it appears there are several. But I think reality is that the Middle East is probably not high on the list of travel destinations for anyone who is not in military, news, or aid, and you probably don’t want to be there without a guide anyway.

We’ve done pretty well with Africa, too. With Arabic covering most of northern Africa, and French covering most of western Africa, the weakest link is eastern and southern Africa, where English is still widely spoken. Portuguese seems to come in handy as well.

And finally, Europe is very language-diverse, but English alone can go a long way in Europe, and adding French and Spanish gets you even further. If you really want to round out your enjoyment of Europe, you’ll want to add German, which opens up Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, and might make life in the Netherlands easier. Once again, we’re not able to cover everything, but the languages we’ve covered so far should be enough for survival in the rest of Europe.

There will be pockets in Europe, Africa, and Southeast Asia where a person could still have a little trouble, but my guess is that anyone who has learned all eight of these languages will also have picked up the communication skills necessary to get by even when he or she can’t find a common language.

And if you think this list might possibly have some effect on my choices of the languages I learn in coming years, you’d be right! The two at the bottom, Portuguese and Chinese, will remain low on my list, and since I already speak English, Spanish, and Russian, one could rightly expect my next three missions to be among Turkish, Arabic, and French. We’ll see!

Do you disagree? Do you think a person needs less? More? Is there another widespread language that I completely missed? Leave a comment!

Get my ebook and learn Italian in one year or less!
  • http://www.fluentin3months.com/ Benny the Irish polyglot

    Very very well put together!! Definitely includes languages I know I need to get to, and I totally agree with Turkish's importance in Germany. I'm actually going to have to adapt my German comprehension to understand the Turkish accent if I want to truly communicate with the majority of people here.

    Although I disagree with the necessity of French being debatable in North America. When I was travelling in Quebec (which is bigger than lots of European countries) I met several people with no English, or very little of it and very pleased to see that I could speak French with them. This is unlikely in Montreal, but is more common than you would think in the rest of the region, even in Quebec city itself, depending of course on the person you meet.

    I don't know any Arabic, but my understanding is that its “dialects” are so vastly different that they are genuinely mutually unintelligable in their spoken form. However, I think someone with experience in languages could make the adjustments.

    I don't tend to make my language choices on global importance, but rather on adjusting to a country that I know I'd enjoy living in. This means learning Chinese and Arabic are going to be quite low on my priorities for a while, because adjusting to life in those countries would not allow me to live the kind of life I can in Europe and the Americas. But when I'm ready I'll get there…

    Thanks for the wikipedia maps, really helps emphasise the point!

  • ielanguages

    Yeah, I would add German for traveling in Eastern Europe since it's still considered the lingua franca in many of those countries instead of English, though of course English is gaining popularity. And it's still pretty widely spoken in Namibia even if it's no longer an official language there.

    I agree with Benny on French in North America too. If you go anywhere in Quebec outside of Montreal, it may be hard to find English speakers.

  • http://www.fluenteveryyear.com/ Randy

    While there may be French-only portions of Canada that are geographically large, they're small in terms of their percentage of the country and also somewhat small in terms of population. But yes, I suppose it's unfair to suggest they're insignificant. Fortunately for them, French made my list, so it's not an issue. :)

    And I agree with your summation of Chinese and Arabic. Ultimately, there's no point to learning any language if you're not going to use it. (Except maybe to show off a widget on your web site telling how many words you know. *cough*. man.) And also, since both of these introduce a need for sorting out dialects, it seems like it would be best to put them off until more the intentions for using them are more clear.

  • http://www.fluenteveryyear.com/ Randy

    Yeah, I had a hard time leaving German off of the list of eight, but if you look at the map of the world as a whole, the German-speaking parts are almost insignificant. And one would like to think that knowing English, French, and Turkish, one could reasonably find *someone* to help out in those parts.

  • http://www.fluentin3months.com/ Benny the Irish polyglot

    ahahahhaaha love the widget joke :D

  • ielanguages

    When I was in Hungary (and oddly enough, the Dominican Republic), I noticed that signs and menus were translated into German first and then English second (or no English at all), but most of the people were able to understand and communicate in English anyway. You can definitely get by without German, but I think I was just trying to make myself feel better since I choose to study German instead of Spanish or Portuguese even though they would be much more useful to me for traveling. :)

  • http://www.upyourbottom.com/ Francesca Maggi

    Bravissimo! To jump start, also hang out with little kids – they'll DEFINITELY let you know when you've said something wrong…!
    And, check out the hide this™ DJ Italian program –
    [and when you make a mistake in all of those languages, please let us know about it!!!]
    http://www.upyourbottom.com

  • http://www.ikindalikelanguages.com lyzazel

    That is reassuring that I got all but one of the languages right (who might have thought of Turkish anyway?). Thanks for the link.

    I already got English, Russian, French and Portuguese down and I'm pretty much on the right track with my Spanish… and I have studied at least some of them all except Turkish yet. And I do plan to learn them all to a level where I can speak them. What about you?

  • ardenttraveller

    Wow, what a cool post! This is pretty much the list of languages I want to be able to speak, for exactly the reasons you stated. The only one I'm slightly surprised at is Turkish; I never knew it had any influence outside of Turkey and Germany.

    For me, knowledge that being able to speak a certain language will vastly increase the number of people I'm able to communicate with is a pretty significant motivator when learning. Right now, I'm working on Mandarin for this very reason (but also because I'm interested in China, it's culture and people) and already have French, German and Spanish under my belt.

    @ielanguages, I had the same experience with German in Hungary, but I'm excited to learn that it was also useful in Dominican Republic!

  • crych

    You are not likely to win any friends among the French by writing:'French rounds out the trio of North American languages, is significantly understood in Europe …' Sure to cause apoplexy at L'Académie française.

  • http://www.fluenteveryyear.com/ Randy

    Cool site!

  • http://www.fluenteveryyear.com/ Randy

    I don't know if I would say “got it right”, because that would imply that I was an authority on the subject – and I certainly don't think I am.
    Regarding Turkish, its influence isn't as obvious until you include the the Turkic languages in your consideration – Kyrgysz, Uzbek, etc.

    I'm solid on English and Spanish, and I'm putting my Russian to the test next week when I visit Tashkent – where I'll also get exposure to Uzbek. My French still needs help, and my Portuguese is weak. There's a high probability of Turkish being my language choice for next year, followed by French and Arabic. (But that's all subject to change on a whim!) Portuguese and Mandarin will probably be last.

  • http://www.fluenteveryyear.com/ Randy

    Seems to me that Turkish is the one that surprises everyone. I could be way off on that one… though it seems to be good knowledge throughout Central Asia.

  • http://www.fluenteveryyear.com/ Randy

    As I understand it, there is no way to make the French happy, and it would be a waste of my time worrying about it. Anyway, they were born French, so they've already reached the pinnacle of living, and the rest is downhill. :)

  • Peter

    I'm not really surprised by Turkish, and I think you should definitely consider it as next year's language. It's a wonderful, complex language… I think it might give you a run for your money as far as “fluent in one year” goes!

    If I had to choose the next two languages to round out the top 10, I think they would be German and Farsi (to round out Europe and the Middle East). Maybe even Dutch, but that would be a stretch.

  • http://www.fluenteveryyear.com/ Randy

    I think if anyone got to the point of knowing all eight of these languages, they'd probably feel no reservation about adding German or Farsi. After learning eight languages, two more don't sound so scary.

    Personally, I love German, and I'm completely in favor of any excuse for adding it to this list. But I actually think one could survive quite reasonably without it.

    I don't know much about Farsi, but I think there's a good case for either that, or Urdu, (or both!) for really rounding out the Middle East.

  • Peter

    You also can't ignore the many languages of India (especially Hindi). Sure English is widely spoken in India, but Hindi is undeniably essential on any list of the worlds “most important” languages. Did you leave it off the list because you mentioned that those eight languages would be all you would need to get by in the “civilized world”, or simply because so many people in India speak English? (I'm not saying that India isn't “civilized”, but it's still a third world country.)

    Just wondering
    -Peter

  • http://www.fluenteveryyear.com/ Randy

    Because English is very widely understood in India, and is already on the list.

    The idea is to balance the maximum world coverage against the minimum number of languages. Learning Hindi puts you up against the point of diminishing returns where you have to start asking yourself whether you've really opened up a whole new section of the world by learning one new language. In fact, I would arguably put Japanese ahead of Hindi.

    But in the cases of Hindi, Japanese, Urdu, Farsi, and even German, I feel that you pass the threshold of diminishing returns and that's why they didn't make the list.

    Personally, though, I don't foresee myself stopping with these eight. And this is where Benny's comments become rather appropriate, because in the end, learning a language is a complete waste if you don't get out and use it. And since I'm far more likely to use German than even Mandarin, I won't be ticking off languages on this list at the cost of other languages that are more useful to me, but which didn't make the cut.

  • http://pocketcultures.com Lucy

    Interesting post. The Wikipedia map understates the value of Turkish a bit, I think because it is only counting official Turkish speakers. In reality the Central Asian languages, especially Turkmen and Uzbek, are near enough for basic understanding, as you say. (I've been to Uzbekistan so I can confirm it works!) There is very little difference between Turkish and Azeri. I understand that around one third of Iranians speak a close variation of Turkish as well.

    I speak Turkish and I'm also learning Arabic. I would say if you want to learn both there is some value in starting with Turkish. The two languages aren't related but they do have quite a few words in common and being able to recognise words will give you an advantage when you're learning the new script. Maybe you learn differently to me though :)

  • http://www.fluenteveryyear.com/ Randy

    Awesome info, Lucy. Thank you. I agree, the Wikipedia map doesn't present the information as well as it could. I wish I could get a map that combined this one with the one on the Turkic Languages page, so it would better show the additional influence in Central Asia and Middle East.

  • http://mcngok.com/ MC Ngok

    Very interesting list! I can't say I disagree with any of your choices, especially given your criteria.

    One thing I would add, though, is how useful knowing languages whose speakers are part of a global diaspora can be. You're right that, for instance, that Chinese isn't found it high concentrations outside of China and a few of the larger Chinese immigrant communities, but Chinese people are *everywhere*, and often quite pleased that they have someone else (a non-Chinese person, at that) with whom to speak Chinese. I have a few Swahili-speaking friends who say the same thing — there's always someone to talk to, and normally once they discover you speak their language they're eager to chat, and help you out if you're in an unfamiliar place.

  • http://www.fluenteveryyear.com/ Randy

    Absolutely. Great point… and actually, that's something that I count on with a list like this. There are going to be a lot of places where you don't speak the first language, but you can reasonably get by on a second language with an immigrant, etc.

  • Jinx

    Re: German… I'd just like to add that in Europe it is definitely a very powerful language, getting you access to Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Luxembourg, Liechtenstein, northern Italy, much of Belgium, parts of Denmark, France, and the Netherlands, and multiple Eastern European countries (e.g. Romania, Slovakia, Hungary, Ukraine, Poland, Czech Republic, Belarus, the Baltic states, and even parts of Russia) where far more people speak it as a second language than do English. German is also spoken quite widely in Argentina and Namibia, surprisingly enough.

  • http://www.fluenteveryyear.com/ Randy (@Yearlyglot)

    I certainly don't disagree. Based solely on number of speakers worldwide, German would actually rank much higher than some of the languages that did make my list.

    The reason it didn't make the list, though, is because the geographical area opened up by knowledge of German is incredibly small when compared to these 8 languages… especially when you consider that within the areas serviced by German, a person could get by quite well knowing the languages on my list and not a single word of German.

    Addressing the countries you named…. Belgium, Switzerland, and France are obviously serviced by French. Most of the Baltic states, Ukraine, Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Poland are teeming with Russian speakers. Turkish are everywhere in Germany. And if you can't fill in the gaps with English, you're just not trying!

  • Nostrum

    I enjoyed reading your post. It's an interesting idea, finding the minimum number of languages to be able to communicate anywhere.

    I'm not sure if I agree with using that as a reason to actually learn these languages though :P Each place where they speak a certain language is gonna have quite of lot of variety in it, even if it is geographically small. For example, learning Japanese, even though it is spoken in a relatively small area, would allow you to appreciate a disproportionate amount of “civilization” (literature, movies, culture, people, etc.) compared to the physical size.

    Of course I'm biased because I'm learning Japanese :P

  • http://www.fluenteveryyear.com/ Randy (@Yearlyglot)

    This was mostly a thought experiment, thought perhaps there is some personal motive behind it. :)

    Thanks for your comments!

  • Casey

    From what I've read, it sounds like each Arabic dialect is very different from all the others, so much that if you're speaking one dialect, someone speaking a different one will barely, if at all, be able to understand you.. I've been thinking about this for a while, and I'm probably going to study the dialect used in either Egypt or Lebanon, in addition to Modern Standard Arabic.

  • Casey

    btw… I just found your blog.. I read your “about me.” I'm glad there are other people who feel the same as me. :) I think I've always just been naturally unconventional.. It's frustrating when my family thinks what I'm doing is crazy, or not going to work, but I'm just following my heart, and what feels right to me. Hopefully we'll both get to travel the world. :)

  • http://www.fluenteveryyear.com/ Randy (@Yearlyglot)

    There are always argument about whether this dialect is different from that dialect, in any language. I find that it's all a reflection of a person's attitude. If you have a negative attitude, you can say that the English spoken in England is nothing like the English spoken in American, and that one often has a hard time being understood by the other — and you would, of course, be right… in a sense. But if you have a positive attitude, you could say most of the language is the same and the grammar is identical, so even though British people pronounce things differently, and add the letter u unnecessarily to words, it's still not much of a stretch to learn one and understand the other.

    I think Egyptian Arabic is probably a good choice because Egypt is large, populous, and tourist-friendly. And I expect that the differences between Egyptian and other dialects of Arabic will be easily overcome, particularly after having overcome the hardest part — learning Arabic! :)

  • http://www.fluenteveryyear.com/ Randy (@Yearlyglot)

    I'm already doing it, my friend. There is no “get to” when it's the thing you want most in life. Nothing is going to stop me! :)

  • Casey

    From what I've read, it sounds like each Arabic dialect is very different from all the others, so much that if you're speaking one dialect, someone speaking a different one will barely, if at all, be able to understand you.. I've been thinking about this for a while, and I'm probably going to study the dialect used in either Egypt or Lebanon, in addition to Modern Standard Arabic.

  • Casey

    btw… I just found your blog.. I read your “about me.” I'm glad there are other people who feel the same as me. :) I think I've always just been naturally unconventional.. It's frustrating when my family thinks what I'm doing is crazy, or not going to work, but I'm just following my heart, and what feels right to me. Hopefully we'll both get to travel the world. :)

  • http://www.fluenteveryyear.com/ Randy (@Yearlyglot)

    There are always argument about whether this dialect is different from that dialect, in any language. I find that it's all a reflection of a person's attitude. If you have a negative attitude, you can say that the English spoken in England is nothing like the English spoken in American, and that one often has a hard time being understood by the other — and you would, of course, be right… in a sense. But if you have a positive attitude, you could say most of the language is the same and the grammar is identical, so even though British people pronounce things differently, and add the letter u unnecessarily to words, it's still not much of a stretch to learn one and understand the other.

    I think Egyptian Arabic is probably a good choice because Egypt is large, populous, and tourist-friendly. And I expect that the differences between Egyptian and other dialects of Arabic will be easily overcome, particularly after having overcome the hardest part — learning Arabic! :)

  • http://www.fluenteveryyear.com/ Randy (@Yearlyglot)

    I'm already doing it, my friend. There is no “get to” when it's the thing you want most in life. Nothing is going to stop me! :)

  • Petersson Erik

    Hi again!
    I am afraid that arabic dialects are so far apart that speakers will sometimes be unable to understand each other. The differences are especially large between northern african and middle east arabic. You should probably try to learn egyptian arabic as it is widely understood, or why not modern standard arabic, the literary language over the entire region.

  • Petersson Erik

    Just a small correction, if you allow. You write “And thanks to the Ottoman Empire, the influences of Turkish can be handy in parts of central Asia beyond just Turkey.” In fact it was the other way around, Turkish was first spoken in Central Asia, and then migrated to the peninsula that the we today call Turkey during the middle ages when it was slowly conquered by Turkish speaking groups. Had this not occured, Greek would probably still be spoken there.

  • http://www.fluenteveryyear.com/ Randy (@Yearlyglot)

    Ahhh…. now the picture is starting to become clearer. You're a history buff.

    I really don't see what you're correcting. I made no assertions as to the origins of the Ottoman Empire. I only said that the Turkish language is useful beyond Turkey. How it got that way is of little interest to me.

    But in fact, whether the Ottoman Empire started in Turkey or in China, the net result is the same — they conquered most of the know world at the time, stretching from the middle east to central asia. And the effect is that knowing Turkish means being able to communicate in those places.

  • http://www.fluenteveryyear.com/ Randy (@Yearlyglot)

    Modern Standard Arabic is not spoken. I could waste my time on Esperanto, too, but I don't, because I want to know languages that are actually spoken, by actual people, in actual places that I want to actually visit. I think Egyptian makes the most sense for right now.

  • Petersson Erik

    Hi again!
    I am sorry if I come off as a besserwisser through my remarks, that was not my intention. You are right that history matters to me, (that's why I wanted to correct you). But that's just me.

    Keep up the good work, Randy!

  • Erolp

    Randy, you are mixing things. You might be thinking of the Mongolian empire, although I am not sure it was a carrier of Turkish languages. The Ottomans held Turkey and adjoining provinces for about 600 years, until the first world war. One period it included much of North Africa, but it never stretched out to Central Asia.

  • http://www.fluenteveryyear.com/ Randy (@Yearlyglot)

    I'm not sure what a “besserwisser” is, though if my rusty old memory of German serves correctly, I've got a pretty good idea. :)

    By all means, I appreciate and heartily welcome any constuctive comments here that add to the information in any way. And since history isn't my thing, I'm sure a number of other people could provide that information better than I can.

    The only negative reaction I have is to the tone. You posted a series of “corrections” on a number of my posts, all within minutes of each other, and all nit-picking tiny details that are mostly irrelevant to the topic at hand.

    Most likely you mean no offense, but I'm sure you can see how it could be taken in a less-than-friendly manner. :)

    And as one final note… there is a certain unspoken tendency among bloggers to give a little more respect to commenters who link to their own blogs. That is to say that if, for instance, your comments linked back to some blog of your own — especially one about history — it would have been instantly clear who you are and from what position you are commenting, as well as the mutual respect of recognizing someone else who is also spending the time and doing the hard work to freely share his passions and knowledge online for the rest of the world to benefit. Conversely, though, when a person comments “anonymously”, there is a natural tendency to question intent.

    With all that said, I do appreciate you taking the time to read and to comment on my blog, and I appreciate any input you have, or any additional information that you can add. After all, this site is here for my readers, and if they should end up getting more information from the comments than from the posts… that's still a success! :)

  • http://www.fluenteveryyear.com/ Randy (@Yearlyglot)

    The bottom line is that I guess it just doesn't really matter to me. Which empire or which force of history delivered which language to which country is a detail that does very little to facilitate my goal of learning to communicate with people around the world.

    Regardless of the history involved, I know that the differences between the Turkish language at the far western edge, and Uyghur at the far eastern edge, are so small that the two can understand each other without translation. How it got that way, I'm happy to let the history experts tell that story. The only detail that is relevant to me (a linguist) is that learning Turkish allows me to communicate with all of those people.

  • Petersson Erik

    Randy, it is clear from what you write that you understand the meaning of besserwisser. Looking back at my comments, I see that they can be taken in such a manner. So you have my apologies!

    I am sorry that have no such blog to offer. I read much about history and languages, but publish nothing in that sphere. What I can offer is only tips for some brilliant books on the history of language that might interest you. They have helped me a lot to learn and understand foreign languages.

  • http://www.fluenteveryyear.com/ Randy (@Yearlyglot)

    Well now that we both understand each other and we're on the same page, let me just say clearly that I welcome your comments and input.

  • http://howlearnspanish.com/ Andrew

    Pretty good but I'd replace Turkish with German–frankly, I think you'll find German used far more prolifically in countries outside of Germany than you will find Turkish used in countries outside of Turkey.

  • http://www.fluenteveryyear.com/ Randy (@Yearlyglot)

    You're absolutely right – German is used more prolifically than Turkish. However it's used in countries that are already reachable, in large part, by other languages. But there aren't many options for other languages if you want to travel in Turkey, or Kazakhstan, or even large parts of China, where Turkic language can get you far but German language won't get you anything.

    On a list of most influential or most useful languages, I would absolutely put German high on the list. But that's not the point of this exercise. :)

  • Anonymous

    Knowing how to read Chinese may help you out in Japan, but English is more likely to be useful, especially in Tokyo. Things have changed there a lot in the last 15 years or so. When I lived there, it was a lot more important to know Japanese to get around. Now, the main Yamanote rail line in Tokyo broadcasts all of their announcements in English. Many major street signs will be in English as well as Japanese.

  • Stealthanugrah

    I just have something to say about the Chinese part. I personally believe that Chinese should be the name of the language family to establish the fact that no one speaks Chinese.

    I do have to disagree with you on this dialect thing. What I’ve seen linguists do is if they don’t know enough about a group of languages is they tend to just throw everything together say it’s one language and call everything in between dialects. “Chinese” has Mandarin, Cantonese, Fujianese, Hakka, and the list goes on and on. Considered to be dialects? Yes. Are they? Nope. Completely different and not mutually intelligible at all. In fact the other day I met two speakers of the Hakka language. One from Malaysia, and one from Bangka, Indonesia. They couldn’t understand each other. The one from Bangka can’t understand people from Jakarta speak Hakka either.

    What aggrevates me is when linguists call the Austronesian languages of Indonesia dialects (nothing to do with you at all, just feel like ranting). Because they aren’t at all. Sundanese is further from Javanese than it is from Indonesian/Malay (even though they’re neighbors.) In fact, the difference between Indonesian and Malay is what I would consider to be Brazillian and European Portuguese.

    Man I should make my own blog haha.

  • http://www.yearlyglot.com/ Randy the Yearlyglot

    Thanks! You’re correct. “Dialect” was a poor word choice on my part, and I’ve updated the text to reflect that.

    In general, I find the argument between “dialect” and “language” to be as superficial and meaningless as the argument between “genus” and “species”. True evolution (whether in language or in biology) happens on something more like a gradient, and less like a scale… and certainly less compartmentalized than the words would seem to imply.

  • Trevie3

    Nice post. This is really fascinating stuff. It seems to me that French isn’t appreciated often enough for its large sphere of influence, and I’m glad you mention it here.

  • http://www.getintoenglish.com David

    Interesting that you didn’t mention German, a language that is dominant in Germany (80+ million folks), Austria, and Switzerland, not to mention the former ‘eastern’ countries where German in still in relatively high use eg Czech Republic, Slovakia, Poland, as well as Slovenia and Croatia.

  • http://www.yearlyglot.com/ Randy the Yearlyglot

    This post isn’t really about appreciating a language, it’s just a matter of efficiently being able to communicate with the most people as a result of learning the fewest languages.

  • http://www.yearlyglot.com/ Randy the Yearlyglot

    This post isn’t really about appreciating a language, it’s just a matter of efficiently being able to communicate with the most people as a result of learning the fewest languages.

    Germany is heavily used in many countries, most of which already speak one or more languages that are already on the list. As far as I can tell, the only country where communication suffers a bit from ruling out German is Austria.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_YCINJXODIKMDMME47X447A3XC4 S.D.I.

    Although this is interesting, I don’t think which language is more “important” really matters that much. Beyond English, which is global, which language you should learn really comes down to personal taste. You say in South America only Spanish and Portuguese are essential. What if you really enjoy, say, Paraguayan culture? Or have Paraguayan friends or relatives? Wouldn’t it make sense to learn Guarani, with “only” millions of bilingual speakers in one country? Or, if you had some connection with Arnhem Land in Australia, you could learn Yolngu, with thousands.

    See, for me, Serbo-Croatian (10s of millions?) and Punjabi (somewhere between 60 and 100 million – many of whom are also bilingual or trilingual in Hindi-Urdu or English) are much more important or me to learn when thinking about my cultural affinities than say, Mandarin, with many times that (my dad is from West Punjab and my mum is from Serbia). I could learn Mandarin, but not solely or even mostly because there are so many speakers. If Cantonese or Hokkien were more interesting to me (which at the moment they are, but you know, things change) due to their media or culture they’d be more “natural” choices than Mandarin. In the same vein, I’d much rather learn the Acadian dialect of French than the Hexagonal because I find Acadian culture interesting (and “Radio Radio” is just that great a musical group a desire to learn Tamil has similarly been created in me by the Yogi B & Natchatras group).

    At the moment I speak native English, good Spanish, and intermediate Serbo-Croatian (the latter of which I’ve been using since I could speak). None of them I learned or continue to learn because of their widespread use or number of speakers. They just have a special connection to *me* (well, Spanish was in school, but then I motivated myself with Spanish-language music and Hispanic friends). I think a personal connection with any given language is a much more useful and much more important motivation for language learning.

  • http://twitter.com/JakePendragon Diego T. Guimarães

    Hey Randy!
    Good. But Swahili is useful language precisely in the remaining part of Africa: the southeast.
    So, with Arabic, French and Swahili the Africa is over. ;D
    And it’s quite easy, quite logical to learn, I think.
    See you!

  • Jesús.

    I hate french u.u so I guess I’ll follow your list changing french for german (I love how german sounds and I like Deutschland a lot) … I hope never to repent about not learning it …
    Spanish is a great language to learn, because spanish is closely similar in all the countries who speak it (not like french or arabic or german that in different points of the world are totally unintelligible due to local dialects)
    Salute !

  • anon

    I missed the connection between Russian and Mandarin to Japan, Singapore, India and Thailand (ok Singapore, chinese, but unnecessary as they all speak English, or at least Singlish). But Russian and Mandarin will be largely irrelevant. And Thailand is not called the land of smiles for nothing. People are incredibly nice, even if all you can manage is a sawatdika.

    As for Arabic, if I am not mistaken, it is more a family of languages, like the romance languages, and there is a high degree of mutual unintelligibility between the different countries. It seems that French would be more useful.

  • anon

    It was a yiddish author who said that a language is a dialect with an army and a navy.

  • http://www.yearlyglot.com/ Randy the Yearlyglot

    I would love to know what in the world you’re talking about, regarding a connection to Russian and Japan and India and what-not.

    Actually, judging by the sum of your comment, I think you may have completely misunderstood the point of this post.

  • http://www.yearlyglot.com/ Randy the Yearlyglot

    That’s funny, because I see the people on Al Jazeera speak with Arabs on the street all the time. Doesn’t seem to be a problem for them.

  • http://www.yearlyglot.com/ Randy the Yearlyglot

    Yes, actually. I find very little value in academic or anecdotal sources regarding anything in a field as large and as subjective as language.

    And yes, it is nice to always be right. Much nicer than carrying a chip on your shoulder all the time. Maybe you should give it a try.

  • CLou

    Hey, great list!
    Helpful to those who want to travel and learn another language.
    But how do you make this into a hobby into a fully time job/skill?

  • http://www.yearlyglot.com/ Randy the Yearlyglot

    I suppose that’s a matter of what you mean by job/skill. Some people become full-time translators. Others become language teachers. But in a more general sense, one could become an international representative in a multinational corporation. The possibilities are only limited by your own imagination.

  • CLou

    Meant as how do I use this to earn money while traveling? Really would like travel to learn another language and then do it as a full fledged career (interpreter, translator, linguist, etc)..

  • http://www.yearlyglot.com/ Randy the Yearlyglot

    If you want to earn money, learn the language and then get a job.

    I’m not a career counselor, I’m a language blogger. This is the best I can do. :)

  • Max Hydrogen

    Tu es un idiot jesús!

  • Max Hydrogen

    没错朋友! 语言学在中国里是宣传!Sadly, few people know that the largest minority language in China is Uyghur, a Turkic language like Ozbek and Turkish that has nothing to do with Mandarin and they are forced to write it with Arabic script rendering most people illiterate, which is is the whole point.

Post Info

Related posts:

Share

Back to top ·